Monday, January 20, 2014

The Best Films of 2013 - By Ray Manukay



 


 This Article first appeared on our legacy site PassMeThePopcorn (Now Defunct)

 

This year was a fantastic year for quality films. Especially near the end of the year when a high number of critically acclaimed films were released…at the same time. I held off posting this list until I could see at least a majority of them. But we are well into 2014 and it seems inappropriate to hold off the list any longer. So I just want to divulge that I have not seen the award season favorites Nebraska, Saving Mr. Banks, August Osage County and Blue is the Warmest Color. I have no doubt that I’ll see them eventually and it may affect this list. In any event, I’ll keep the reader posted through our social media channels if I do decide to re-evaluate my picks.





 


Honorable Mention: (In no particular Order:)

 

American Hustle

Lone Survivor

Dallas Buyers Club

Captain Phillips

All is Lost

Blue Jasmine

Out of the Furnace

Inside Llewyn Davis

The Great Gatsby

The Lone Ranger

Fruitvale Station

 


 


Here are my Favorite Films of 2013!

 


#10: Stoker

 

directed by CHAN-WOOK PARK

 

The film Stoker is not for everyone. In fact, for traditional audiences it is often almost unbearable to watch.

 

Almost.

 

The truth is as unsavory and disturbing as the events in Stoker appear to be, the film is absolutely riveting and mesmerizing. It’s this conflict that drives the enjoyment of Stoker. Often times film critics almost tripped over themselves trying to describe the film, calling Stoker “disturbingly good” or a film of “savage beauty“. I prefer a more straight forward description: One of the year’s best.

 


 



 


# 9: Mud

 

directed by JEFF NICHOLS

 

Mud

 

This humble coming-of-age drama benefits from impressive performances from Tye Sheridan, Matthew McConaughy and an outstanding ensemble cast. But the real strength of Mud is the steady hand of writer and director Jeff Nichols. In lesser hands, the film could have easily turned formulaic. But Jeff Nichols manages to keep the proceedings truthful and earnest. Mud brilliantly captures the complexities, disappointments and optimism of romantic relationships. What’s unique about the film is that Mud covers this ground without being a traditional romance. In fact several genres are used to explore the core theme of true love. It is an impressive feat and solidifies Jeff Nichols place as one of the most exciting, emerging voices in film today.

 


 


#8: Gravity

 

directed by ALFONSO CUARON

 



 

There is not much more praise I can add to the kudos that Gravity has already received. At its heart the movie is a simple survival film. But Gravity is much more when one factors in the technical achievements and visual effects of the film. Some of the effects are almost mind boggling and defy description. When it is all said and done Gravity is simply the best action film of the year.

 


 


#7:The Place Beyond the Pines

 

directed by DEREK CIANFRANCE

 



 

Exploring the relationships between fathers and sons was a popular theme this year, and as the reader will soon see, is well represented on this list. The Place Beyond the Pines explores the age old story of when the sins of the father trickles down to the son. At the center of the film is the outstanding performances by Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper. It’s unfortunate that the film was released early in the year. It’s clear that short-sighted awards season voters overlooked the film. The Place Beyond the Pines is unapologetically dramatic bordering on operatic and will be recognized in the future for being one of the Underrated gems of 2013.

 


 


#6: Her

 

directed by SPIKE JONZE

 



 

Putting aside the selling point for the film Her of a man falling in love with his computer’s operating system, the theme of the film is really quite simple.

 

Relationships and love are complicated.

 

Not to mention challenging, absurd, selfish, romantic, comforting, disconcerting …even insane.

 

Spike Jonze’s Her touches on all those points and does so brilliantly. After initially almost mocking the idea of a man falling in love with an inanimate object Her forces the audience to look at themselves and examine their own relationships. Her explores the absurdities, the benefits, the pain and joys of being in love. After awhile the idea of falling in love with a computer, doesn’t seem so crazy after all. In fact it might be even more sane and less complicated than falling in love with an actual person.

 


 


#5: 12 Years a Slave

 

directed by STEVE MCQUEEN

 



 

To call 12 Years a Slave a difficult film is an understatement. As much as I agree with all the kudos that the film has received for being important, powerful, educational, dramatic and ultimately inspiring, I also have to give merit to the criticisms towards the film for being exploitative, morbid, inappropriately beautiful and desensitizing.

 

In short, my feelings for 12 Years a Slave are complex.

 

On the one hand 12 Years a Slave is a powerful piece of cinema, featuring amazing performances from Chiwetel Ejiofor and Lupita Nyong’o, but on the other hand it’s not a movie that I would want to watch as entertainment multiple times.

 

It’s painful and disturbing to watch.

 

Which… is the point of 12 Years a Slave. As much as we wish that it did, the wounds caused by slavery, have not completely healed. Its effects are still felt today. As painful as it is to endure, 12 Years a Slave is a film that needs to be seen. (Much like Schindler’s List or another strong social commentary drama from this year Fruitvale Station). 12 Years a Slave creates conversation and provokes thought. Which is what a great film aspires to.

 


 


#4: The Spectacular Now

 

directed by JAMES PONSOLDT



 

 

It wasn’t too long ago that coming-of-age films were considered a cheap off-shoot of the raunchy sex comedy genre. The cynical idea of youth being wasted on the youth no doubt contributed to Hollywood’s lack of genuine and accurate coming of age films. But as we all know, there is so much more than the discovery of sex that goes into our formative years and The Spectacular Now is an example of a perfect coming of age film. Despite some of the heavy themes such as alcoholism, responsibility, death and yes…sex, none of it comes off as preachy or exploitative. In fact, there is so much that is great in The Spectacular Now that I find it difficult to string together worthy enough adjectives to describe the movie.

 

The best thing that I can come up with is the idea of catching lightning in a bottle.

 

The film is full of little moments that do this. Some of the moments left me breathless with how accurate and sincere they came across. One of the themes in the film is the idea of the effects on a young man living in a home without a father figure. That is just one of the subtle themes in the film. There are tons of them. The ideas almost creep up on the viewer as they watch. The moments are so truthful that we never feel preached to or force fed. They just happen and are absorbed just like in real life. A confrontation near the end of the movie between a mother, played by Jennifer Jason Leigh and his son played by Miles Teller is arguably one of the most moving, painful and ultimately inspiring moments in the year of film. It is the result of the perfect blend of strong acting, excellent writing and honest direction. A brilliant captured moment for everyone to see.

 

The Spectacular Now is simply put… spectacular.

 


 


#3: About Time

 

directed by RICHARD CURTIS

 




 

I know this is not a traditional best-of-the-year pick by many. But this under-rated gem was one of the most enjoyable and touching films I’ve seen in recent memory. About Time was marketed as a romantic comedy, but that’s only one aspect of the film, and a minor one at that. Comparisons have been made to the cult classic Groundhog Day which is slightly accurate, but not really fair. About Time is not as cynical or comedic.

 

In fact, it’s not even as romantic.

 

About Time is more of an unabashedly life affirming film. A humble call to cherish our loved ones and to not sweat the small stuff in life. Without creeping too much into spoiler territory, the time travel aspect featured in the film is not so much a gimmick or device, but more of an analogy on how to deal with life’s unavoidable bumps.

 

About time also shares some themes with The Place Beyond the Pines and The Spectacular Now which were also featured on this list.

 

The exploration of the father and son relationship.

 

If The Place Beyond the Pines is about the sins of the father, and The Spectacular Now is about the challenges of a young man growing up without a father figure, About Time explores the strengths and benefits of having a loving and ideal father.


 


I admit, the father/son relationship in this film is a bit too perfect. There is a bit of a fairy tale aspect at play here. One glance at this list and the reader will see that cynicism, and harsh reality is well represented. So forgive me if I crave a bit of fairy tale in my entertainment now and then. Don’t we need a little of that in our life and in our entertainment? God knows I do. That is what About Time provides.

 

Above all, About Time is an enjoyable, breezy and inspiring film and worthy of being called one of the year’s best.

 


 


#2: The Act of Killing

 

directed by JOSHUA OPPENHEIMER

 



There are plenty of jaw dropping and shocking truth bombs in this unique and groundbreaking documentary. But it would be inaccurate to characterize this film as a simple shock-fest or history exploration documentary. The Act of Killing is also about the power of film and art. Both positively and negatively.

 

Director Joshua Oppenheimer and the makers of this film use the subject’s love of entertainment and media to subtly both shed a light on the little known mass political murders which occurred in 1965 in North Sumatra and also slowly uncover the vulnerabilities and humanity of the film’s main subject, a gangster named Anwar Congo. A man that one can justifiably be called a monster.

 

It is an awe-inspiring balancing act.

 

On the surface, we are seeing how crime films and the media possibly influenced and inspired these “gangsters” to commit some of these atrocities. On the other hand, we see the effects on the subjects when they re-enact the monstrous events of their past. The performances acts as a sense memory for Anwar Congo and it unexpectedly awakens feelings of pain, loss and regret. That’s just one small sample of one of the levels in this amazing film.

 

The Act of Killing also works as a traditional documentary, subtly inspiring a call for action against a corrupt government and system. It also touches on how we as a society are all in some ways responsible for creating and encouraging an environment like this.

 


 


 


And my favorite film of 2013 is…


 




 


#1: The Wolf of Wall Street

 

directed by MARTIN SCORSESE

 

the_wolf_of_wall_street_movie

 

Let’s just get this out of the way. I don’t condone the type of wild and outrageous behavior depicted in The Wolf of Wall Street.

 

In fact, I find it deeply disgusting and infuriating.

 

Just like I find the killings in a film like Goodfellas disturbing or the excessive, reckless drug use in Fear in Loathing in Las Vegas reckless and irresponsible.


 


My admiration of The Wolf of Wall Street and those previously mentioned films is not an endorsement of those kinds of life choices.

But that kind of consumer driven mentality exists and The Wolf of Wall Street powerfully illustrates the practice of that. The fact that it has provoked such a strong reaction from some people speaks to the power of this film.

I don’t think The Wolf of Wall Street glorify’s the greed is good lifestyle.

Yes. The film is wrapped in the guise of a comedy. But who says comedies can’t be thought provoking, painfully truthful or disturbing? In fact, that is the best kind of comedy.

Critics of The Wolf of Wall Street also point to the so-called happy ending. But is it really a happy ending or a painfully truthful indictment on how our American society rewards people like this?

To me it illustrates how we are all in some way responsible for creating and supporting people like this. That’s at least my interpretation. I’m not definitively proclaiming another artist theme for for their piece. That’s not for me to say. But if this is indeed the case, which I suspect it is, isn’t that a worthy message to send to audiences in these financially driven times?

Again, I don’t want to speak for the filmmakers. But let’s give arguably the greatest story teller and dramatic visionary of our time, some credit and agree there may be some truth to this argument. Especially when the alternative viewpoint is greed at all costs is good.

Sure. This opens up another can of worms to consider. Is it really an effective message if it may be confusing to some of the audience. That argument can be made. But personally I find the best kind of art is the one that isn’t so overt with it’s intentions, but more subtle, and thought provoking. But that’s a personal preference. I have no problem with people who prefer the opposite. This is debatable, and I don’t wish to engage in that discussion here.

But putting aside the moral complications of The Wolf of Wall Street, the film itself is a fantastic piece of entertainment. It is filled with exciting performances, riveting story, drama, suspense, and laugh-out-loud comedic moments.

The Wolf of Wall Street is an enjoyable showcase of skills from arguably the greatest director and one of our most talented performers living today.

That is why the film is my favorite of 2013.

Friday, January 03, 2014

The Worst Films of 2013 - By Lon Harris

 This article first appeared on our legacy site PassMeThePopcorn (Now Defunct)


movie-43-615
 

By Lon Harris

 
Lon Harris shares his list of the low points in the year of film in 2013.
 

#10: WORLD WAR Z

 
I have not read the novel that inspired this troubled Marc Forster production (is there any other kind?), but I can only assume that it has some kind of narrative structure. Things happen that cause other things to happen, and thus a story progresses in some kind of logical fashion. Beginnings, middles and ends and all that. Maybe a few characters who seem like they almost resemble actual living people are introduced, they make decisions that impact their eventual fates, maybe we learn a little something about them and even, by extension, ourselves in the process. That sort of stuff.
 
Woirld War Z has no time for any of that, though I’m not sure what else it was doing, either. Brad Pitt sort of rambles around the world getting into scrapes that all end the same way (zombies!), and then things just sort of work themselves out.
Also, the notion of a mass of zombies moving in unison, in the style of a single organism, is a good one, and could have looked pretty spectacular, I should think. But, save for that iconic one-sheet image of zombies piling up a wall like ants, which doesn’t even make a huge impact in the film, “World War Z” does nothing with it.
 
tumblr_inline_myrmpatJbK1qzh21r
 
If it hadn’t made half a billion dollars worldwide, I’d almost hope it might do something to slow the glut of lame zombie movies with which we’ve been stuck for years now.
 

#9: OZ THE GREAT AND POWERFUL

 
My issues with Oz The Great and Powerful don’t really center around the story, which is forgettable but not atrocious, and does manage to cleverly tie up everything and set the stage of “Wizard of Oz” neatly.
 
tumblr_inline_myrmt1yjiR1qzh21r
 
The problem here is that, at no point did I believe any of the human beings were actually standing in the merry old land of Oz. “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” came out in 1988, and I had an easier time believing Bob Hoskins was really tooling down the main Toontown drag than I did thinking James Franco was actually skipping down the Yellow Brick Road.
So tragic that Sam Raimi – one of the greats of contemporary inventive DIY guerrilla-style filmmaking – retreated behind a bank of monitors, putting together a formulaic, bubble-gum theme park attraction that couldn’t feel further away from the quirky, charmingly hand-made Oz of the classic film.
 

#8: AFTER EARTH

 
I know Will Smith was involved, and that automatically got projects fast-tracked in 2013 Hollywood, but it’s hard to imagine anyone thought “After Earth” was conceptually sound. There are SO MANY problems with this just as a pitch!
– There are only two main characters, and no antagonist, and no one is ever on screen together
– The film is structured as an action film but there’s almost no action
– A feature-length film will be entirely dependent on the acting chops and charisma of Jaden Smith
 
tumblr_inline_myrmuhzVDF1qzh21r
 
– Despite being called “After Earth” and being set on an abandoned Earth, the fact that the characters are on Earth doesn’t matter and never comes up
– The plot requires the main character to eliminate all emotional response, which not only is impossible to do but makes him a totally unsympathetic blank figure.
– At one point, there is a dramatic scene between our hero and a computer-generated hawk.
 

 

#7: THE LORDS OF SALEM

 
I love Zombie’s odes to ’70s grindhouse – “House of 1000 Corpses” and “The Devil’s Rejects” – but when he aims for more mainstream-style horror, say with his “Halloween” reboot, it typically misses the mark. But “Lords of Salem” is his weakest outing yet, an incoherent, plodding and surprisingly sloppy attempt to re-imagine “Rosemary’s Baby” but without any of the symbolic heft or mounting terror.
 
Zombie’s wife, Sheri Moon Zombie, plays a totally uninteresting DJ who is possessed by a coven of witches harkening back to the infamous Salem Witch Trial era. That’s not a quick summary of the film’s main action – it’s a complete list of everything that happens. (“Possession” itself in the film largely consists of Ms. Zombie writhing around on the floor, moaning, and having odd, frequently sexual visions of witch rituals.
 
tumblr_inline_myrmw6nmpD1qzh21r
 
Zombie struggled to find distribution for the movie, and at the screening I attended at SXSW, said to the audience beforehand “Some of you will like this, and others are going to hate it.” He seemed oddly ambivalent about the whole thing, maybe realizing the idea was not fully baked only after the project was completed?
 
[I should also note, the film implies that Salem really was overrun with witches a few hundred years ago, thus making the Puritans disgraceful, cruel, inhuman behavior correct and called for. That’s some truly vile revisionist history there… Why not make a movie in which the grown men who tortured and murdered innocent young girls are the bad guys?]
 

#6: THE SWEENEY

 
This update of the 1970s British TV cop drama compiles every known cop movie cliche into one blisteringly insipid mess. I never need to see another film in which the brash, impulsive but also always-correct-when-it-counts cop/unit breaking all the rules and getting chewed out by The Chief. The presence of respected actors like Ray Winstone and Damian Lewis, trying their best with hopeless material, only highlights how tired these old routines really are.
 
Let’s also talk about the woeful action sequences. We have a bank heist turned shootout in London’s Trafalgar Square so obviously inspired by Michael Mann’s “Heat,” it’s practically Sweded. Unlike Mann’s original, the action mechanics of the shootout make no sense here – the good guys are able to block incoming gunfire with absolutely any physical piece of matter. At one point, portly Ray Winstone is able to dodge an onslaught of bullets behind a tiny metal ladder. Surely ONE of those bad boys would have managed to get through! Come on! There’s even a car chase on a very thin, narrow road that’s only the width of a single car. Where’s the drama in that? What are you even going to do if you catch up to that other car? Bump it?
 
[I’d also add that there’s a sub-plot in which the fetching Hayley Atwell’s character (age 31) is having an extra-martial affair with Ray Winstone’s character (age 56) which is not just unrealistic, but downright distasteful.]
 
tumblr_inline_myrmzvmzYz1qzh21r
 

#5: GI JOE: RETALIATION

 

Hard to believe that, out of the two contemporary “GI Joe” movies, the lame Stephen Sommers entry comes out ahead, but here we are. Jon Chu’s follow-up gives us all the bored, phoned-in performances, offensively inane anti-humor and bloated, ugly spectacle we’ve come to expect from toy brand tie-in movies, but with the added benefit of being totally incomprehensible.
 
It felt at times that I was watching two different “GI Joe” movies that had no intention of ever really coming together – sort of like the “Godfather II” of the series, I suppose. I’m not sure if the ninjas ever got around to influencing the more traditional soldier plot line; I’d pretty much checked out by then.
 
tumblr_inline_myrn23V4Mm1qzh21r
 
[Final note: Why does Bruce Willis continue to make movies when he clearly hates them so much? I know they pay him a lot of money to star in action movies, but he could make a lot of money with his own brand of applesauce, too, or by opening a Hollywood weed dispensary. I feel like he’d rather do absolutely anything else than star in an action movie, at this point, based on his performances in films like this one.]
 

#4: THE CANYONS

 
OK, so the hilariously awful disaster zone that is “The Canyons” is largely going to be blamed on Lindsey Lohan, and she definitely deserves some of the blame. She’s so wooden and distant here, it’s like she’s getting a Viking funeral. I kept waiting for someone in a horned helmet to shoot a flaming arrow into her. The character’s so zonked out and vacant, it took me like 45 minutes before I realized she’s the protagonist.
 
tumblr_inline_myrn30cpXI1qzh21r
 
The plot – such as it is – concerns Lohan’s Tara, who is dating Christian (porn star James Deen), a trust fund scumbag using his family’s money to make terrible no-budget horror movies. Tara has been secretly having an affair with Ryan, an old flame who also happens to be the star of Christian’s latest bad movie. Christian finds out about the affair and sort of messes with everyone, but not in a way that is compelling.
 
There’s just no sense of why writer Bret Easton Ellis or director Paul Schrader (who used Kickstarter to raise funds for “The Canyons”) wanted to tell this meandering, dull story about these assholes. The film opens with a montage of condemned, abandoned former movie theaters throughout Los Angeles, so I thought – even if it didn’t work – the movie would be some kind of commentary on the end of the film business, or the end of movies as a communal, social activity. But then the film itself is barely about the film industry.
 
Also, from just a technical/professionalism standpoint, the movie reminds me of something you’d expect students to submit to a 24-hour film festival. It looks like Schrader shot it on an iPhone, the dialogue is both highly theatrical and bland, and the story has no momentum.
 



 

#3: UPSIDE DOWN

 
The set-up for this remarkably stupid sci-fi romance is that there are two planets orbiting directly side-by-side, facing one another. One is made up of poor, exploited workers and the other their wealthy capitalist masters. (They keep saying “up there” or “down here,” even though “up” and “down” don’t have a lot of meaning when you’re talking about planets. Everyone would feel like the other planet was “up there.”)
 
Anyway, it’s forbidden and physically impossible to go to the other planet from your planet, because everyone’s tied by their own gravity field to their own planet. Nonetheless, two very dull, uninteresting people – a poor orphan from “down here” (Jim Sturgess) and a rich girl from “up there” (Kirsten Dunst) – fall in love, and he becomes determined to use any means necessary to sneak to the upper planet to romance her.
 
Upside-Down_510x317
 
The “up there/down there” stuff never stops seeming counter-intuitive and silly. (In particular, it has a really irksome tendency to assume that all the characters in this fantasy world would find the whole “double gravity” concept really weird and fascinating, just like we the viewers do, even though they have lived in this reality all their lives. Would people really drink anti-gravity cocktails from upside-down martini glasses? That seems inconvenient.)
 
But the film’s biggest problem is that it spends so much time establishing the double gravity rules and physics, it forgets to make the actual couple that’s in love compelling or relatable in any way. At heart, the movie’s a romance, but I didn’t give two shits about this couple. (Plus Kirsten Dunst’s character also has amnesia, so she’s impossible to invest in because she’s not even 100% sure who she is!)
 

#2: Movie 43

 
A surprising number of celebrities take part in this atrocious bathroom comedy anthology from Peter Farrelly. The stories are supposedly part of an insane pitch a desperate screenwriter (Dennis Quaid) makes to studio executive Greg Kinnear, but the film even gives up on this bookend conceit about halfway through, largely out of embarrassment. (For real!)
 
I think part of the reason these sketches seem SO awkward and painful is that they’re over-relying on the shock value of seeing these celebrities doing/saying stupid, “edgy” things (except for the scene where it’s supposed to be funny because they’re celebrities playing superheroes.) In some cases, such as the Halle Berry/Stephen Merchant “Truth or Dare” sketch, there actually AREN’T jokes other than the humiliation they put Halle Berry through.
 
tumblr_inline_myrn6kwbQN1qzh21r
 

There’s no real theme or coherent idea aside from “dick and poop jokes.” (The bookend thing is insane and adds nothing.) And nothing is relevant. The superhero parody ignores the last 50 years of actual superhero shows and films. The Apple parody focuses on a stupid product with no real-world relevance that’s based on the iPod, not even the iPhone. Also, inherent in the notion of a film anthology with multiple directors is that the individual segments will have a unique style or sensibility. These all feel like anonymously made Internet sketches.
 

#1: BAD MILO

 

Sadly, the final SXSW film I saw was not only “worst of the fest,” but one of the lamest and least funny comedies I have ever seen. It was just called “Milo” then but it’s being released as “Bad Milo.” The basic premise is that a regular guy (played by Ken Marino) starts having horrible digestive problems brought about by stress. (Lots of pooping and farting.)
He later discovers that he has a demon he calls Milo living in his colon andMilo occasionally escapes his bowels and goes to seek vengeance on people who are causing our hero (whose name I forget) stress.
 
It’s literally an entire movie of shit and fart jokes. I would say “it’s 100 minutes of shit and fart jokes,” but I walked out after about an hour.
 
But check out the CAST!
– Ken Marino
– Gillian Jacobs (from “Community”)
– Stephen Root
– Peter Stormare
– Patrick Warburton
– Toby Huss

 
tumblr_inline_myrn8217241qzh21r
 
It’s unfathomable to me that all of these people would sign on to a movie whose sole joke is “a guy has to shit and fart a lot.” Seriously, there are no jokes other than “ha ha that guy is covered in shit” or “now he has to shit again” or “oh my god the monster is now covered in his shit” or “the monster is going up his ass! lolololololol!” Even at 13, I didn’t find shit and farting this funny, and after about 15 minutes, I hit poop joke fatigue.