Priscilla

Priscilla (2023)

A Touching, Personal Escape from the Gilded Cage

★★★★☆

Watched 10 Feb 2024 — A superior, grounded exploration of a life lived in the orbit of a legend.

Directed by Sofia Coppola, Priscilla arrives as a more intimate and effective counterpoint to the flashy biopics we've seen recently. Coppola excels at capturing the subtle seduction of a young girl into the celebrity orbit of Elvis Presley, illustrating the romantic entanglement and the inevitable isolation that follows. While the film doesn't shy away from the problematic age gap and power dynamics, it treats its subjects with a steady, empathetic hand. It is a story of a naive teenager evolving into a seasoned, courageous woman who finally finds the strength to reclaim her own life.

"Her steady hand keeps the perspective on Priscilla even though the temptation is to fall under the spell of the charismatic Elvis... Time will look more favorably on the movie Priscilla."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Sofia Coppola
• Starring: Cailee Spaeny, Jacob Elordi
• Supporting: Ari Cohen, Dagmara Dominczyk, Tim Post
• Studio: A24

The Vision

Coppola’s directorial fingerprints are all over this work, emphasizing internal reflection over external spectacle. Her vision prioritizes Priscilla’s perspective, resisting the urge to let the charismatic Elvis hijack the narrative. By focusing on the quiet moments of loneliness within Graceland, she highlights the "no-win situation" Priscilla’s parents faced and the emotional abuse that stemmed from Elvis’s growing addictions. It is a beautifully illustrated look at the "elephant in the room," presenting the relationship’s complexities with a sincerity that makes the third-act departure feel earned and heroic.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Venice Victory: [Cailee Spaeny](https://www.imdb.com) won the Volpi Cup for Best Actress at the Venice Film Festival for her nuanced portrayal of Priscilla's growth.
• Height Difference: To emphasize Priscilla's vulnerability, Sofia Coppola frequently utilized [Jacob Elordi’s 6'5" stature](https://www.hollywoodreporter.com) to make him tower over the 5'1" Spaeny.
• Music Licensing: Unlike the 2022 biopic, this film does not feature [Elvis Presley's music](https://www.rollingstone.com) because the estate denied licensing, forcing the production to use era-appropriate covers and anachronistic indie-pop.

✅ Pros

• Touchingly personal and grounded perspective.
• Exceptional performance by Cailee Spaeny.
• Excellent directorial focus that avoids the "Elvis trap."

❌ Cons

• Slow, deliberate pacing might frustrate fans of flashy biopics.
• Lack of original Elvis music may be jarring for some.
• Exploration of the age gap remains uncomfortable and difficult.

🏆 Final Verdict

The superior Elvis-related film of recent years. It is a seasoned, experienced look at a famous relationship that finally gives the title character the understanding and sympathy she deserves.

View on Letterboxd

High and Low

 

High and Low (1963)

Akira Kurosawa at the Top of His Game

by Ray Manukay

★★★★★

Watched 24 Feb 2026

Suffice it to say, High and Low is a masterwork. Any attempt to sing its praises in written form has no doubt been done already by critics more eloquent than me. It is a film that defies articulation; it simply must be experienced. Sequence after sequence reveals new layers and challenges that Kurosawa handles masterfully.

🎬 Production Credits

Director: Akira Kurosawa

Writers: Hideo Oguni, Ryūzō Kikushima

Cinematography: Asakazu Nakai, Takao Saitō

Editor: Akira Kurosawa

Music: Masaru Sato

Based on: King's Ransom by Ed McBain

As in life, it's not an issue of doing the right thing. But the ramifications of doing the right thing. — Ray Manukay

The Dynamic Tension

The film thrives on the moral conflict of Kingo weighing the financial ruin of a ransom demand against the life of a close family friend. Kurosawa builds incredible tension in scenes where the police listen in on kidnappers, and in the meticulous police station sequences where clues are gathered. It is a showcase for a director who can keep a procedural investigation feeling immediate and breathless.

💡 Fun Facts

• The film's Japanese title, Tengoku to Jigoku, literally translates to "Heaven and Hell."
• Kurosawa famously had a house built specifically to be burned down in his pursuit of realism, though here he uses the verticality of a hillside house to literalize class divide.
• The "pink smoke" sequence was achieved through hand-coloring the film frames, a striking departure from the black-and-white cinematography.

The Performances

• Toshiro Mifune: Confirms his place among the greatest actors in history with subtle and effective emotional turmoil.
• Tatsuya Nakadai: Brilliant as the cool, methodical Inspector Tokura.
• The Ensemble: A masterclass in blocking and group dynamics, particularly in the claustrophobic first act.

✅ Pros

• Masterful direction and tension.
• Profound exploration of conscience.
• Breathtaking performances from the leads.

❌ Cons

• None. (Except waiting too long to see it).

Read the original review on Letterboxd

🏆 Final Verdict

I feel deep shame for waiting so long to see this film. Please don't make the same mistake I did. High and Low is an essential pillar of cinema that must be seen at one's earliest convenience.

Anyone But You

 

Anyone But You (2023)

A Bizarre, AI-Adjacent Jumble of Rom-Com Cliches

★★☆☆☆

Watched 09 Feb 2024 — Beautiful locales and an affable cast can't save a film that lacks the heart and chemistry to be truly touching.

Directed by Will Gluck, Anyone But You attempts to be a throwback to the golden age of 90s and early 2000s romantic comedies. However, the result feels more like a clumsy reassembly of genre stereotypes than a cohesive story. While the production design is beautiful and the cast is undeniably "easy on the eyes," the film is missing that special, undefinable element that makes the best rom-coms effective. Despite being loosely inspired by Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing, the tributes are limited to obscure callbacks that fail to ground the "ludicrous and forced" physical comedy.

"The movie feels like it was written by Artificial Intelligence. A bunch of classic romantic comedy cliches and genre stereotypes from other films have been jumbled up, reworked and clumsily reassembled into this film."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Will Gluck
• Starring: Sydney Sweeney, Glen Powell
• Supporting: Alexandra Shipp, GaTa, Hadley Robinson, Dermot Mulroney
• Studio: Sony Pictures / Columbia

The Vision

Gluck’s vision seems unabashedly focused on checking the boxes of a romantic comedy rather than simply telling a good story. By forcing silly physical jokes into a narrative that lacks genuine chemistry between its leads, the film feels synthetic. The attempt to modernize the Bard’s wit is lost in a sea of "unrecognizable easter eggs," making the proceedings feel ineffective for fans of the source material. It is a movie designed for a younger generation who might not have seen the classics, relying on "beautiful locales" to mask its lack of sincerity and believable romance.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Shakespearean Ties: The character names Bea and Ben are direct references to Beatrice and Benedick] from *Much Ado About Nothing*.
• Viral Success: Despite mixed reviews, the film became a massive [box office sleeper hit, fueled by a viral TikTok trend involving the song "Unwritten" by Natasha Bedingfield.
• Dermot’s Return: The inclusion of Dermot Mulroney is a meta-nod to his status as a rom-com icon from 1997's *My Best Friend's Wedding*.

✅ Pros

• Affable, attractive cast that is "easy on the eyes."
• Beautiful Australian locales and high production design.
• A successful return of the genre's commercial viability.

❌ Cons

• Lack of palpable chemistry between Sydney Sweeney and Glen Powell.
• Ludicrous and forced physical comedy.
• Narrative feels like an "AI-written" jumble of cliches.

🏆 Final Verdict

A disappointing attempt to recapture the magic of the 90s rom-com. Unless you're looking for purely "harmless" fluff or are a die-hard fan of the leads, this AI-adjacent assembly of tropes may leave you cold. Up to the viewer to decide.

View on Letterboxd

The Boys in the Boat

The Boys in the Boat (2023)

A Squeaky Clean Slice of 1930s Americana

by Ray Manukay

★★★☆☆

Watched 08 Feb 2024

An earnest, crowd-pleasing men-on-a-mission sports film. The Boys in the Boat has all the classic team athletics story elements: an underdog group, inspiring speeches, swelling music, and unfair obstacles. Director George Clooney unabashedly leans hard into the 1930s slice of Americana setting to a charming effect.

🎬 Production Credits

Director: George Clooney

Writer: Mark L. Smith

Cinematography: Martin Ruhe

Editor: Tanya M. Swerling

Music: Alexandre Desplat

Based on: Daniel James Brown

Reminiscent of that feeling one gets when walking down Main Street at Disneyland enjoying the 1930's period sights and sounds. — Ray Manukay

Nostalgia vs. Realism

If you turn off the cynical side of your critical eye, it's hard not to get caught up in the old-fashioned, simpler time nostalgia. The film does go a bit overboard on the throwback sentimentality and "oh shucks" charm—especially in the third act as the team faces Nazi Germany. However, the worst one can say is that it's "too" wholesome, which is a rare critique in today's landscape.

💡 Fun Facts

• The actors underwent three months of training with a rowing coach to look like a professional crew.
• The film was primarily shot at Winnersh Film Studios in Berkshire, UK, despite its Washington state setting.
• Rowing is historically one of the oldest Olympic sports, having been part of the program since 1900.

The Team

• Callum Turner: Anchors the film as the hardworking Joe Rantz.
• Joel Edgerton: Plays the over-his-head coach delivering the essential inspiring speeches.
• The Production: Costumes and design feel like they were ripped straight from Thornton Wilder's Our Town.

✅ Pros

• Charming period production design.
• Family-friendly and earnest.
• Classic, effective sports underdog arc.

❌ Cons

• Leans heavily into "oh shucks" sentimentality.
• Lacks gritty realism or nuance.

Read the original review on Letterboxd

🏆 Final Verdict

While a critic could nitpick that the film is too squeaky clean to be realistic, it’s worth remembering it’s based on a true story. It's a wholesome, nostalgic trip that succeeds if you're looking for an old-fashioned happy ending.

American Fiction

 

American Fiction (2023)

A Razor-Sharp Satire of Art and Business

★★★★½

Watched 06 Feb 2024 — Arguably the best film of 2023; a gut-busting and thought-provoking All-American family tale.

Directed by Cord Jefferson, American Fiction is a smart, effective, and razor-sharp satire of modern American art and commerce. While the film is filled with biting commentary on the entertainment industry, it remains anchored by a deeply relatable family core. Jefferson’s debut evokes the social and entertainment satire once mastered by Woody Allen, but delivered with a refreshing, unique, and timely perspective. At its heart, Jeffrey Wright and Sterling K. Brown provide outstanding turns as emotionally tortured brothers navigating the complexities of modern America.

"Short sighted audience members might laud this as an outstanding satire of the modern African American experience. But I think that's limiting. I think the title sums up perfectly that this is an all-american family tale that everyone can associate with."

— Ray Manukay

🎬 Cast & Crew

• Director: Cord Jefferson
• Starring: Jeffrey Wright, Sterling K. Brown, Erika Alexander
• Supporting: John Ortiz, Issa Rae, Leslie Uggams, Adam Brody
• Studio: [MGM / Orion Pictures](https://www.mgm.com)

The Vision

Cord Jefferson’s vision transcends specific demographics to tell a universal story about the expectations placed upon artists. By skillfully alternating between "roll in the aisles" satiric comedy and poignant family drama, he highlights the absurdity of an industry that often demands stereotypes over authenticity. His directorial style is both refreshing and confident, ensuring that the film’s "razor-sharp" wit never overshadows the genuine emotional stakes of the characters. It is a masterful balance that challenges the audience to assess how we consume art and "American Fiction" itself.

🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts

• Literary Roots: The film is based on the [2001 novel "Erasure" by Percival Everett](https://en.wikipedia.org), which Jefferson adapted for his directorial debut.
• Award-Winning Script: Cord Jefferson won the Academy Award for [Best Adapted Screenplay](https://www.oscars.org) for this film, marking a massive victory for first-time feature directors.
• The "Woody Allen" Influence: Critics have frequently compared the film's intellectual wit and urban neurosis to early [Woody Allen](https://www.imdb.com) comedies like *Annie Hall* or *Manhattan*.

✅ Pros

• Outstanding, career-best performances by Jeffrey Wright and Sterling K. Brown.
• Razor-sharp satire that is both funny and thought-provoking.
• Universal themes that transcend the "African American experience" label.

❌ Cons

• Satiric tone may feel too "inside baseball" for some regarding the book industry.
• The ending's meta-narrative shifts can be polarizing.
• Some supporting characters feel slightly under-explored.

🏆 Final Verdict

A masterpiece of modern satire that manages to be gut-bustingly funny while delivering a punch to the gut. It is an essential, All-American family tale that demands to be seen and discussed by everyone.

View on Letterboxd