Directed by Chloé Zhao, Hamnet is a profoundly shattering look at the theoretical inspiration for Shakespeare’s Hamlet. While aesthetically beautiful and impeccably acted—specifically by a luminous Jessie Buckley and a strong Paul Mescal—it is an emotionally grueling experience that feels less like entertainment and more like a direct sit-down with pure grief. The film captures the unimaginable pain of parental loss with such intensity that it borders on emotional manipulation.
"I equate watching Hamnet to being put into an emotional wringer without my full consent. I wanted to watch a movie—not lose sleep over a newly acquired, unwanted memory."— Ray Manukay
🎬 Cast & Crew
- Director: Chloé Zhao
- Starring: Jessie Buckley, Paul Mescal
- Source Material: Maggie O'Farrell (Novel)
- Cinematography: Zhao-esque visual mastery
The Vision
There is a palpable air of pretension here. Chloé Zhao seems to suggest that Hamlet—arguably the greatest work of art in history—requires this harrowing backstory to be fully appreciated. By simplifying the play's origins into a singular tragedy, the film risks diminishing the very legacy it tries to celebrate. While the production is sincere and top-tier, it lacks the necessary balance found in genre staples like Shakespeare in Love.
🎬 Cinephile Fun Facts
- Literary Roots: Based on the 2020 award-winning novel by Maggie O'Farrell, which explores the life of Agnes (Anne) Hathaway.
- Zhao's Return: This film marks Chloé Zhao's return to intimate, character-driven drama following her stint in the MCU with Eternals.
- Award Pedigree: Buckley and Mescal are both Academy Award nominees, bringing a heavy-hitting dramatic weight to this 16th-century setting.
✅ Pros
- Masterclass performance by Jessie Buckley.
- Breathtaking, luminous cinematography.
- Impeccable technical production and period authenticity.
❌ Cons
- Borderline traumatic and grueling viewing experience.
- Strains under its own sense of pretension.
- Lacks narrative balance or relief from the trauma.
Full Review
A profoundly disturbing, shattering, and heartbreaking look at the possible theoretical inspiration for William Shakespeare's Hamlet, Hamnet is an aesthetically beautiful and well-acted film. Jessie Buckley, especially, shines as the lover, wife, and eventual mother to Shakespeare’s children. She runs the gamut of emotions, movingly portraying the tragedies of various life events. Paul Mescal is strong as well, and the entire cast and crew do a top-tier job of producing a handsome piece of art.
There is no debate that Hamnet is an accomplished and prestigious work, but in terms of pure entertainment, it is a mixed bag. The film should probably include a disclaimer for "likely emotional trauma after viewing." If you enjoy a realistic, heartfelt portrayal of one of the most painful life events imaginable, then this is something to seek out. It moves the audience in authentic, painful ways, giving a front-row seat to an unimaginable grief that many people probably don't care to experience. I can honestly say this film has traumatized me in a way that few others have.
The debate I run into is this: while the film is beautiful and sincere, is experiencing traumatic pain worth it for the sake of a movie? Death is a part of life and should be reflected in art, but Hamnet had me asking if this profound pain is something I want to experience while watching a film. For me and many others, the answer is likely no. Although earned, the pain is not something I find myself looking for. It equates to being put through an emotional wringer without my full consent. I wanted to watch a movie, not be disturbed to the point of losing sleep. The intensity actually made me angry at the filmmakers; if that was the goal of Chloé Zhao, then she accomplished it.
On an intellectual level, I appreciate the film and recognize it as one of the best of 2025. However, after sitting with my thoughts, the excessive emotional manipulation bordered on pretension. This work asks the audience for a greater appreciation of Hamlet by sharing a probable inspiration—the death of Shakespeare’s only son. But does Hamlet really need a greater appreciation? It is arguably the greatest work of art ever and stands on its own. Its legacy may even suffer by simplifying its origin in this way. Zhao is essentially saying she will make the audience appreciate Hamlet even more than they already do; if that isn’t the definition of pretension, I don't know what is.
Comparisons will be made with Shakespeare in Love, but that film was a celebratory love letter. Hamnet is a letter to grief and its role in art—a worthy message, but one delivered with a sledgehammer. While the film is moving, I’d debate if it is truly inspiring or life-affirming. I can't honestly say the trauma was worth it, especially as a parent. At its core, I cannot recommend Hamnet. It is an accomplished work that appeals to a different crowd, but I will warn you: watch at your own emotional peril.
🏆 Final Verdict
An accomplished work that I simply cannot recommend. Hamnet delivers its message of grief with a sledgehammer. Watch at your own emotional peril.
View original review on Letterboxd
No comments:
Post a Comment